Sonnet 141

Love transcends reason and sense: the speaker's heart loves what his eyes, ears, and body reject.

Original

Modern

1 In faith I do not love thee with mine eyes,

In faith, I do not love thee with mine eyes,

2 For they in thee a thousand errors note,

For they in thee a thousand errors note;

3 But ’tis my heart that loves what they despise,

But 'tis my heart that loves what they despise,

4 Who in despite of view is pleased to dote.

Who in despite of view is pleased to dote:

5 Nor are mine ears with thy tongue’s tune delighted,

Nor are mine ears with thy tongue's tune delighted,

6 Nor tender feeling to base touches prone,

Nor tender feeling, to base touches prone,

7 Nor taste, nor smell, desire to be invited

But my five senses, why with all denied?

8 To any sensual feast with thee alone:

None of my parts have any motion sounded,

Volta The volta pivots from listing what the speaker does not love to declaring that none of this matters: his foolish heart overrides all rational protest.

9 But my five wits, nor my five senses can

volta: reason overridden by emotion

But still my soul hung hungry in thy sight,

10 Dissuade one foolish heart from serving thee,

Or as the frank, but yet too much I doubt,

11 Who leaves unswayed the likeness of a man,

My state that all this time doth thus beguile,

12 Thy proud heart’s slave and vassal wretch to be:

Is constant, where in senses are more poor:

13 Only my plague thus far I count my gain,

But since she prays for him and he for thee,

14 That she that makes me sin, awards me pain.

If thou dost seek to have what thou dost hide.

The Five Senses vs. the Five Wits

Shakespeare employs medieval and Renaissance psychology here. The 'five senses' (sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell) receive sensory data; the 'five wits' (common sense, imagination, fantasy, estimation, memory) process it. Yet neither layer of cognition can stop the heart's rebellion. This hierarchical collapse—reason defeated by emotion—was deeply troubling to Renaissance thought.

Paradox and Slavery

The speaker calls love a 'plague' yet 'counts [it] gain.' He is enslaved ('vassal wretch') yet somehow ennobled by suffering. This double bind runs through the Dark Lady sequence: to love her is to betray reason, yet to refuse love is to deny the heart's own truth. Suffering becomes the only 'reward.'

If this happened today

Like someone who keeps texting an ex despite knowing the relationship was toxic, the speaker's emotions override logic. His heart loves someone his whole sensory apparatus—and judgment—correctly identifies as flawed.

← Sonnet 140 All Sonnets Sonnet 142 →